Category Archives: Case Study

I Love it When a Plan Comes Together

By Robin Crouch

Our Firm’s mission statement is: “The Thom L. Cooper Co. is dedicated to building a continuing relationship with each senior client: to protect their wealth from the devastating costs of a catastrophic healthcare situation; to conserve their wealth for their use during their lifetime; to shelter their wealth from unnecessary legal expense or taxes; and to assure that their wealth is transferred to their heirs with minimal cost or delay.”

I love it when a plan comes together!

Case Study: A Husband and Wife came to us in 1999 to develop an estate plan, both were healthy and living on the family farm. Over the years as their health deteriorated, both ended up in a nursing home. The good news is, with the help of their children, they continued to update their plan to protect the farm and other cash assets for their children. As a result of their ongoing planning, Mom’s nursing home bill was paid by the State of Ohio, Dad’s bill was covered by his long-term care insurance, and the children inherited a total estate of $802,000. Even better, after the death of the second spouse, the estate was approved for the Qualified Farm Use Election and the children saved $24,496 in Ohio Estate Tax while inheriting the farm at current market value.

Want to find out how to make your plan come together? Call us at Cooper Law Firm.

What You Can Learn from Gary Coleman’s Poor Planning

By Attorney Renee Fox

Prepare yourself for groundbreaking news: Lady Gaga has more friends on Facebook than you do! In fact, she has more Facebook friends than any other living person. She has more than 10 million friends. Regardless of his death one year ago, Michael Jackson currently has more Facebook friends than Lady Gaga; And many other dead celebrities aren’t doing too bad either. Let’s take a look at the late Gary Coleman; whose estate has recently made headlines.

Gary Coleman’s Estate

Gary Coleman was a child who starred in the TV sitcom Diff’rent Strokes between 1978 and 1986. He grew to hate his catch phrase “Whatchu talkin’ ’bout Willis?”even though it made him millions.

Gary Coleman was paid as much as $100,000 per episode but had financial difficulties later in life. After funds went to his parents, agents, lawyers, and taxes, only a quarter of his earnings may have reached him. After the mismanagement of his Trust by his parents Coleman was forced to declare bankruptcy.

Coleman made appearances, married and divorced, attempted suicide, had kidney transplants, worked as a security guard, was prosecuted for punching a woman who mocked him, collected model trains, and ran for Governor of California in 2003 and placed relatively high in the rankings.

Tragically, Coleman died earlier this year after suffering from a head injury. Three people are in the running to be the special administrator of Coleman’s estate. One is his ex-wife, another is his former girlfriend, and a third is his former manager. Manager Dion Mial relies on a 1999 last will and testament that names him as executor. Former girlfriend Anna Gray relies on a 2005 will. Ex-wife and alleged surviving common law spouse, Shannon Price, filed a 2007 codicil that purports to amend all prior wills. She is hoping to locate a subsequent will naming her as executor.

Logically, the 2005 will would revoke the 1999 will. A handwritten note from 2007 would not have significant legal effect, unless it was executed with all the will formalities, such as witnesses and notaries. But it could be used to show his intent to revoke the 2005 will and may be accepted as a holographic will in some jurisdictions.

Getting married in 2007 could also cast doubt on earlier wills. However, Shannon Price and Mr. Coleman were divorced at the time of his death. Her basis for inheritance rests on her allegation that they reconciled and formed a new relationship after they were divorced. Court documents indicate that the two lived together, shared bank accounts, and held themselves out to the world as married, even after the divorce. Price was also Coleman’s agent in his advanced health care directive, and she gave the order to take Coleman off of life support. At the time of his death, Coleman was living with his ex-wife, Shannon Price, and his death certificate indicates that he was married.

Is this an estate worth fighting over? Remember, he declared bankruptcy in 1990? The answer depends upon the value and size of his estate both at and after death. There is still marketing to be done, book deals to be made, movie rights, and sales of memorabilia to be had. He had a home, a pension, and residual rights. To show the value of such media attention, Price is reported to have photographed Coleman on his deathbed and then sold the photos to the tabloids.

Final Thoughts

Sound estate planning can involve sophisticated plans that protect assets from creditors and predators, avoid unnecessary taxation, and build assets over generations. But there is also something to be said for a simple document that names executors or trustees and distributes your assets according to your wishes. It can avoid years of litigation and family turmoil. Large or small, we all need an estate plan contact the Attorneys at the Thom L. Cooper Company to set up an appointment today.

What Happens If Your Executor Lives Out of State?

By Lauren Cooper

A few months ago Brenda and Sarah came in to discuss what needed to be done following the death of their father, George. Brenda was retired and lived close to George, so she had always been the one who had handled his affairs. Although Sarah was willing to help as needed, she worked full time as a doctor and lived on the other side of the state of Ohio. It was no surprise to them therefore that George’s Last Will and Testament appointed Brenda as the Executrix to handle the administration of his estate. What they did not expect was that the probate court would say that Brenda was unfit to administer the estate because she lived in the state of Kentucky.

In accordance with the county’s regulations, the Magistrate decided that Brenda could not be Executrix of George’s estate, even though Brenda lived only thirty minutes away from the county where George lived, because she was not a resident of the State of Ohio. The Court, against George’s wishes as set forth in his Last Will and Testament, appointed Sarah as the Executor and she begrudgingly had to manage the time consuming responsibilities of being Executrix of the Estate. While state law does not prohibit non-residents of Ohio from serving as Executors, many courts apply this regulation as a local rule. Some probate courts that do allow non-residents to serve usually impose additional regulations on their appointment. These regulations might require the out of state Executor to obtain bond or force the Executor to transfer all assets of the estate to a bank within the boundaries of the County.

The situation that happened to George’s family was unfortunate not only because of the inconvenience that it caused, but also because it could have been so easily avoided if George had established a Living Trust. Because the administration of a Living Trust is private, that is, not monitored by the probate court, it is not subject to the county’s local rules that regulate who is considered to be an appropriate Fiduciary. A Living Trust not only makes the process of administering an estate easier for whomever you appoint, but also can give you the piece of mind that no magistrate can usurp your wishes in regards to whom you appoint to handle your affairs after you pass away.

A Probate Over a Safety Deposit Box?

By Lauren Cooper

probateAfter her mother had passed away, Sharon and I met to discuss what needed to be done to settle her mother’s estate.  We had previously worked with Mom, who was a widow, with the goal of protecting her children from the hassle and expense of probate.  We established a Revocable Living Trust for Mom and during that process she had mentioned to us that she had a safety deposit box at her local bank.  We advised her to go to the bank and have it re-titled into her Trust.  When Mom went into the bank to do this, the bank teller told her it was unnecessary to retitle the safety deposit box because Sharon already had full access to the box.  However, after Mom passed away, it became clear that what she had been told regarding her safety deposit box was misleading.

Mom’s real estate and bank accounts were all titled into her trust and were therefore immediately under the control of her appointed Successor Trustee, Sharon.   Within a month of Mom’s death all of the bills were paid and the assets were ready to be distributed, however there was one thing that Sharon had not handled—the safety deposit box.  When Sharon went to Mom’s bank, the teller informed her that she no longer had the ability to access the box because she had only been listed as Power of Attorney over the box.  Unfortunately, the authority provided through a Power of Attorney ends at death.

The bank continued to refuse access to the safety deposit box by anyone but an Executor appointed by the Probate Court.  Unfortunately, Sharon had no choice but to open a probate administration, which much to Sharon’s dismay would make everything in the box public record.  Even with all of the heirs cooperating, it took over two months of submitting documentation to the Court before Sharon was appointed Executor and the bank let her remove all assets from the safety deposit box.  At this point you must be wondering what was actually in this the safety deposit box.  No it wasn’t gold, diamonds, or stock certificates.  When Sharon went into the box, all that was there was one $50 bond that was worth around $35!

For the most part, our clients that require probate administrations of their estates never saw an Elder Law Attorney prior to their death to establish an estate plan.  However, in this case, Mom’s one innocent mistake brought about by the short-sighted advice of an employee at her local bank caused her heirs several additional months of time and hundreds of dollars in Court costs.

Luckily, you can fix or avoid this problem easily as long as you are aware of what needs to happen and, in some cases, are persistent with your bank.  Safety deposit boxes can usually be re-titled into a Revocable Living Trust, which would give the Successor Trustee immediate access to them. If you do not have a trust or if your bank does not allow for your trust to be the owner, then you should register your Successor Trustee as a co-owner of the box.  If you have a safety deposit box, this simple measure will prevent the loss of time and money that our client’s heirs had to endure.

The New Son-In-Law

smallA few months ago, we had existing clients, Bill & Margaret come in for a review of their trust and other documents.  Their concerns and questions were not so much related to their documents as they were centered around their middle aged daughter who had recently remarried.  They explained they felt a certain amount of discomfort or even distrust of the new son in law, who by the way had no gainful employment.  Their daughter was an only child and would be heir to about a half a million dollars at the death of her parents.  Their question was simple “how can we protect our daughters inheritance?”

Answer = Legacy Trust

Keeping Your Assets in the Family

As is the case in most wills, the majority of people who set up revocable and irrevocable trusts leave their assets outright to their beneficiaries, such as children, when they die. So, what’s wrong with that? Well, there may be a better way.

Instead of leaving your assets directly to your beneficiaries, why not leave them to your beneficiaries’ Legacy Preservation Trusts, which gives the “benefits of the assets” to your children while protecting the assets from outsiders, such as creditors, spouses, and in some cases estate taxes.

You can create a Legacy Preservation Trust naming your child both as trustee and beneficiary

when you die. A Legacy Preservation Trust has a set of rules for managing assets for the benefit of your children as beneficiaries. The rules may be broad or narrow.

Reasons to Create a Legacy Preservation Trust

There are a number of good reasons to create trusts for your children today. Just as you’ve

learned about the benefits of a trust, undoubtedly your children will wish to avail themselves of the same opportunity one day. But in the case of your children, there are a number of additional benefits to leaving assets to them in their own Legacy Preservation Trust.

These are:

  • The assets left to your children will be protected from their spouse in the event of divorce;
  • The assets left to your children will be protected from their creditors in the event of financial hardship, and
  • You can be assured that any IRA distributions to you children will be maximized and not lost to lawsuits, divorce or foolish spending habits.
  • Upon your child’s death, the unused assets Will go to the beneficiaries you choose instead of the in-laws or others.

Legacy Preservation Trusts can provide that, during your children’s lifetimes, your children have access to the income and the principal in their trusts for their health, education, maintenance and support – so that you’re not giving them a “gift with strings attached: or “ruling from the grave.” But, when your child dies, you can arrange of the unused portion of their inheritance to go to other beneficiaries, such as your grandchildren. You may also choose to have younger beneficiaries be restricted to receiving benefits for health and education only.

For more information, please call our office today 800-798-5297

Should I Marry Again?

by Attorney Thom L. Cooper

dimeo_elizabeth_11Often after our clients lose a loved one they find someone else with whom they want to spend the rest of their life. Getting married again late in life can offer renewed happiness & purpose, but it can also result in heartbreak without planning.

As Elder Law Attorneys we are often asked: “Does this marriage make sense from a financial point of view?” The answer, like so many things in life, is that it depends. For example should your new spouse go into a nursing home they can require you to spend your assets to pay for your new spouse’s nursing home bills.  The state may also put liens on your home. Even a pre-nuptial agreement doesn’t help in a nursing home or catastrophic health care situation. In addition, if a widow is entitled to VA benefits due to her husbands prior service, those benefits may be cut off after a new marriage.

In spite of some of the above negative consequences there are things you can do legally to avoid many of the legal pitfalls as described above. It is absolutely critical in considering remarriage to receive advice from both a domestic relations attorney and an elder law attorney.

If you are interested in receiving a free checklist of some of the issues to consider upon remarriage, please sign up and we will e-mail it to you.

The Old and the Frustrated

Today, I offer you the first in a mini-series of legal soap operas. I hope to present a light-hearted but serious look at some of the problems I see every day in my office: with the best of intentions, trouble follows ill-advised and poor planning. Although the stories are fictitious, the situations are typical of those I see on a daily basis. Your charge is to read and learn. See how many problems and lessons learned you can identify.

Scene 1: The Beauty Shop

When Betty sat down in the chair, she really had a lot on her mind. Mable could not draw Betty into their normal conversation about the Smith twins or the Rader widow. Even tattoos and short skirts seemed lost on Betty that day. All that Betty could think about was what she was going to do about the farm. With her husband, Herman, gone now for a year, and Betty just recently diagnosed with Parkinson’s, it was time to get the farm out to her kids, Sally and Jim. But it wasn’t as simple as it seemed: Herman’s kids were grown-ups when she married him married 5 years ago, nice enough while Herman was well, but they didn’t even visit when he was sick. She did not want her 200-acre farm, that her dad gave her in 1950 to go to his kids. She had to find a way to make sure that Sally and Jim could keep the farm in the family.
Lesson 1: Gifting the farm may result in several needless tax problems, e.g.
(a) federal gift tax & penalties may be imposed depending on the value of the farm
(b) the children will receive the farm at a carry-over tax basis which results in capital gains tax when the kids sell the property after mom’s death.
(c) Betty will lose her $250,000 capital gains exclusion if she sells her home during her lifetime.

She finally told Mable the problem and Mable gave her the best advice that 22 years in the people business had taught her: “You want to give that farm to Sally and Jim right way, just like Esther Wright did years ago with her kids. Esther went to Joe Futz. He’s a great attorney, been in the business for years. My husband knows him from the Elks and he’s really reasonable. He’ll just do you want without asking a lot dumb questions. He’ll just get it done”.

Lesson 2: Betty loses control of her farm when she deeds the property outright to her kids.

It was a hard decision, but Betty decided that Mable was onto something so she set up a meeting with Attorney Futz. Betty told Attorney Futz that she wanted to deed over her farm to her kids now, so he prepared the deed, as Mable had promised, wiithout any fuss. She was so relieved that she was able to keep the farm in her family. She knew that she had done right by her kids.

Lesson 3: The farm is now subject to the children’s problems and liabilities, e.g. divorces & lawsuits.

Scene 2: Stuff Happens

Betty’s son, Jim, dies suddenly in a car accident.

Lesson 4: Jim had no pre-marital agreement with respect to inherited property.

Jim met his wife, Jessica, in high school. Jessica was married to Biff, the all-star, for a few years and they had 2 children. When they broke up, Jim decided that Jessica was for him and they were married. Betty was not sure she was so happy with the “woman with a past” but she was happy when little Jimmy Junior was born. Unfortunately, Jim’s death brought with it a whole new set of worries.

Lesson 5: Betty had no plan to exclude step-children, nor did Jim.

Jim always planned to take care of Betty, nothing more had to be said – no formal contracts or arrangements were necessary; it was safe with him. The problem was that Jim died before Betty leaving all of his worldly possessions to his wife, Jessica. This included Jim’s half interest in the farm his mother, Betty, deeded to him for safe keeping. Jessica also had other plans as time went on, including reuniting with Biff, who was working at the local feed mill. Biff was a great guy but no one had given him a chance to get ahead. Biff helped Jessica see the opportunity to help him fulfill his life-long dream to own a charter boat and be a fishing guide on Lake Erie. All he needed was money for the boat, a small office building, licenses, employees … and if Jessica used the money she was entitled to from Jim’s share of the farm, they wouldn’t even need a loan. Jessica knew that this was the right thing to do.


Lesson 6: Betty never planned for The “Law of Unintended Consequences”: Betty always though she would die before her son. Now her daughter-in-law, and not her son, owns half of the farm.

Jessica called Betty, very excited about Biff’s new company and the fact that he was willing to let her be a junior partner. With her money and his expertise they would be set. All Betty had to do was give her the money from the farm … and this is where the problems really began. Betty didn’t have $650,000 to buy Jessica out, nor did Betty want to sell the farm. The farm was her home and had been in her family for generations and she wanted it to go on with her family.
Lesson 7: Any co-owner of a property (Jessica) can “partition” or force the sale of the property.

Betty called Attorney Futz. He would know what to do, surely. Attorney Futz listened carefully and was very polite but had to explain to Betty that Jim’s share of the farm now belonged to Jessica. Jessica had the right to force the sale of the entire property in order to get her one-half share, even if Betty’s daughter Sally, the other half-owner, did not want to do so.

Lesson 8: Betty can be forced to move from her home and be “on the street”.

What should Betty do? Where could she turn for a friendly, and reliable opinion? She found herself back in the chair, seeking advice once again from her best friend and hairdresser, Mable.

Lesson 9: A good friend and advisor is hard to find.


There are ways not to end up like Betty. Every problem described above could have been avoided with proper legal planning and advice. If you have a home or a farm and would like to find out some of the possible solutions, call Lisa Nelson at our office. Lisa is one of our legal assistants. She will call you back, at no cost, and give you some general suggestions about how you might proceed, either with your existing attorney or with our office.

A Lesson Learned: Plan Now to Avoid Probate and Reduce Estate Tax

Today was a big day for my family as my son took his first steps into elementary school. Sure it was just kindergarten… but you would have thought by the reactions of my wife, myself, and about 40 other parents, that we were sending our kids off to college or boot camp! We watched as kids piled into their new classroom with backpacks busting with pencils, rulers, glue sticks, craft paper, lunchboxes, band-aids, paper towels, crayons and more! The kids looked prepared for anything and ready to take on new challenges. And, we parents were just as excited, wondering if we had done enough to get them ready for a new life stage where we would no longer be the sole influence in their rearing.

While I realize this was all probably more traumatic for me than my son, I spent a good portion of my ride into work today thinking about Jacob’s backpack, its contents, and how the most exciting thing my wife and I did all weekend was make sure that everything on the “supply list” made its way into the bag. We had to rush to find things on the school supply list, but in the end I know that we have given him all the tools he needs to be a successful kindergartner!

While much of the weekend was spent finding the best deal on glue sticks (Target) and the best deal on a bouncy ball (Walmart), a portion of my weekend was spent working on office matters that found their way home with me.
Last Thursday, I met with the “Smith” family and they were dealing with a crisis much larger than the first day kindergarten. Their crisis consisted of a combination of lung cancer, heart trouble, and a 35% chance of Mrs. Smith not making it out of a serious surgery that was taking place within the week. From what I could tell, the Smiths seemed to be a great Ohio family… they were hard workers and through that hard work they had accumulated significant wealth that included property in two states and over $1.3 million dollars in liquid assets. They came to our office to figure out what would happen if Mrs. Smith did not make it through the surgery.
Due to the fact that they had always had good health, the Smiths had put off doing any type of planning for life’s final stages, and had no plan in place for minimizing taxes, probate avoidance, or the distribution of their assets. They were in a state of high anxiety and stress over the heal situation, but the fact that they had no estate plan was sending the Smiths into a total panic. 

The Smith’s lacked even the basic documents—there were no financial powers of attorney, no Last Will and Testament, and no healthcare directives. They knew nothing about the benefits of creating and funding a living trust. They were admittedly unprepared, but by having the hardest working trust and estate planning department in Ohio (in our humble opinion), we were able to get a great plan in line for them in a very short time. Mrs. Smith was extremely relieved that we could help reduce some of her anxiety before her surgery. Being “prepared” and knowing that the right tools were in place to take care of her ill husband and disabled son, meant that more of her energy could be focused on her own health concerns.
My wife and I had a deadline to have our son’s school supplies that we knew about all summer … and yet we procrastinated. The Smith’s had their entire lives to think about making an estate plan to avoided probate, and minimize taxes for their heirs and set up an orderly distribution of their assets … and they procrastinated. Rushing to accomplish things is never the best scenario, but fortunately it worked out for both of our families – this time.
Even though we were able to accomplish the Smith’s goals at the last moment, we encourage you to plan early – don’t wait for a crisis! Not having their plan in place could have cost the family even more hours of stress, days of frustration with the court system, and thousands of dollars.
I challenge the readers of this blog to keep from procrastinating, get educated, and get prepared by having AT LEAST the minimum estate plan in order before the unthinkable happens.
While it is never too early to be prepared, putting things off can have very unintended results that can cause serious anxiety, family feuds, and significant monetary losses. Seek out advice today and make sure your goals and your plan are in sync so you can rest assured that you are prepared!

Enjoy your IRA so Ohio doesn’t!

A family recently visited our office to find out how to pay for home health care.

George and Sarah* have been married for 55 years. Sarah suffers severe rheumatoid arthritis that is so severe she must use a walker. To make matters worse, she recently fell and broke two ribs. George is doing his best to keep Sarah at home, but at age 79, Sarah’s care is beginning to take its toll on him. George is trying to find home health care aides to assist him with her care. He does not want to put Sarah, the love of his life, in a nursing home.

At wits end, George visited a local County Agency to inquire about benefits for Sarah. They informed George that although Sarah qualified for care medically, he had too much money to qualify. The county suggested that George spend down his retirement account to $20,000 and buy a new car to replace his 5-year-old car and he should qualify.

George asked what we could do to help. He told us that it would be very difficult to maintain his quality of life if he only had $20,000, and perhaps the thought of a new car would be appealing if he were sixteen years old, but his Buick only had 37,000 miles on it – he liked it just fine.

We began with a review of their assets using the same criteria the County used. They have a nice home, the 5-year-old Buick Century, a few CDs, and a large retirement account from George’s former employer.

In reviewing George’s dilemma, we determined that if we would create income, or a pension, with his retirement account – one he could not outlive – he would qualify for benefits and keep his Buick. We knew that if George turned his lump sum IRA into a guaranteed income stream, the State of Ohio would look at this as income, not as an asset; this income would be George’s and therefore not counted in determining Sarah’s eligibility for benefits.

We converted George’s IRA to income so that he could maintain his lifestyle while qualifying Sarah qualified for Home Health Care benefits the following month. We are happy to report that George is able to keep Sarah at home, right where they want her to be.

*(not their real names)

How Mr Campbell Disinherited his Son While Trying to Avoid Probate

A common goal among the elderly is to save their children from going to probate when they die. On this blog we talk about several techniques to “probate protect” assets. Depending on the type of asset, probate protection can be as easy as filling out the proper paperwork to add a beneficiary to an account at the institution holding or managing the assets. However, what comes of this common practice is often an unintended result. 

Consider the following recent scenario:

Mr. Campbell (not his real name), a widower, passed away owning the following assets at his death: A $1500 checking account, $26,000 Money Market, $142,000 Annuity, and an Investment Account holding $125,000 in assets.His Last Will and Testament named his son, John, as the Executor of his Estate. It also specified John and his sister, Lisa, as the sole beneficiaries with all assets to be divided equally between them. Mr. Campbell told John, in no uncertain terms, that the assets were to be split 50/50 between John and his sister. When Mr. Campbell passed away, John, as Executor, sought our advice when he suspected that a long, drawn out probate administration would be required to distribute his dad’s assets.

After some initial research on the accounts, I had the opportunity to explain to John that his father had done a great job in “probate protecting” his assets and that no administration would be required… however, I also had to explain that in the process, he ended up disinheriting John. Mr. Campbell had listed Lisa as a beneficiary on every account he had and the sole beneficiary of the Annuity contract. John was stunned.
Luckily, there was a happy ending for this family. Because the family was very close, Lisa did end up giving John his 50% of the estate, as her father intended, but she certainly was under no obligation to do so.
While things worked out in the end for the Campbell Family, all too often this type of Probate Avoidance ends up causing family battles and sibling rivalries. When planning for the distribution of your own Estate, it is important to understand that your “Last Will and Testament” does not control distribution for Joint Accounts, Payable on Death Accounts, or any asset with a beneficiary. When working towards your goal of Probate Avoidance, make sure you work with a professional elder law team to make sure you understand the implications of your beneficiary choices.



Related Posts with Thumbnails

Blog subscribe via Email